Press Release: Civil society organisations express urgent concerns over the integrity of the 2024 general elections to the Lok Sabha

11 civil society organisations wrote to the ECI, highlighting the role of technology in affecting electoral outcomes. The letter includes an urgent appeal to the ECI to uphold the integrity of the upcoming elections and hold political actors and digital platforms accountable to the voters. 

08 April, 2024
2 min read

New Delhi, April 08, 2024: Earlier today, 11 civil society organisations wrote to the Election Commission of India (“ECI”) in a collaborative effort, highlighting the role of technology in affecting electoral processes and outcomes. The letter includes an urgent appeal to the ECI to uphold the integrity of the upcoming elections and hold political parties, candidates, and digital platforms accountable to the voters. 

The signatories to the letter are Article 21 TrustAssociation for Democratic ReformsCampaign Against Hate SpeechCommon CauseInternet Freedom FoundationLibTech IndiaMaadhyamMazdoor Kisan Shakti SangathanNational Alliance of People's MovementsRajasthan Asangathit Mazdoor Union, and Software Freedom Law Center, India

Following are the concerns and appeals outlined in the joint letter:

  1. Online campaigning and surrogate advertisements: Expenditure on surrogate advertising and targeted online campaigns by political actors to influence voter perception and beliefs are not under adequate scrutiny. The ECI must increase the accountability of political parties and digital platforms by adopting internationally acceptable, rights-respecting standards for regulating political expenditure on online ads and targeted campaigning. 
  2. Use of emerging technologies such as deepfakes: The use of generative AI technology (particularly deepfakes) by political actors with the intent to influence voter perception and impact electoral outcomes raises urgent concerns. The ECI must introduce measures to increase the accountability of political actors who deploy generative AI with the intent of influencing voter perceptions and political narratives.
  3. Inadequacies of the Voluntary  Code of Conduct: The Voluntary Code of Conduct is non-binding, has no legal force, and was drafted without any transparency and input from civil society. Lower standards are applied to digital platforms in India as compared to other jurisdictions, there is no monitoring of platforms’ compliance, and there is a lack of redressal for voters in case of non-compliance. The ECI should initiate a transparent and participatory process spearheaded by a third-party, independent organisation(s) to arrive at a Model Code of Conduct (“MCC”) to be followed by political candidates and digital platforms - with clear enforcement guidelines and reporting mechanisms.
  4. Voter surveillance: The use of facial recognition and video surveillance technology at polling booths can deter the right to vote without fear or coercion, may violate the right to privacy, and is antithetical to a free and fair election. The ECI should initiate a careful reevaluation of the implementation of surveillance technologies in electoral processes and assess it against strict standards of legality, necessity and proportionality.

###

Regards,

  1. Article 21 Trust
  2. Association for Democratic Reforms
  3. Campaign Against Hate Speech
  4. Common Cause
  5. Internet Freedom Foundation
  6. LibTech India
  7. Maadhyam
  8. Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan
  9. National Alliance of People's Movements
  10. Rajasthan Asangathit Mazdoor Union 
  11. Software Freedom Law Center, India

Subscribe to our newsletter, and don't miss out on our latest updates.

Similar Posts

1
Supreme Court issues notice in Sushant Singh's transfer petition challenging website blocking

Sushant Singh has sought transfer of his writ petition from the Bombay High Court to the Supreme Court, challenging Rules 8 and 16 of the IT Blocking Rules, 2009. On 02.05.2025, the Supreme Court issued notice and tagged it with SFLC’s pending petition raising similar issues.

6 min read

2
Section 44(3) and the Systematic Dismantling of the RTI Act: A Fact Check to Ashwini Vaishnaw

Section 3 has no relevance to the RTI amendment, and Mr. Ashwini Vaishnaw's response fails to address the core concern: Section 44(3) weakens citizens’ right to information and transparency in governance. IFF does a fact check. 

6 min read

3
Budget Session 2025: A Digital Rights Review

The Budget Session of Parliament, held from January 21 to April 4, 2025, included a recess from February 13 to March 10 for Standing Committee reviews. Key discussions covered various national issues, including digital rights and freedoms.

12 min read

Donate to IFF

Help IFF scale up by making a donation for digital rights. Really, when it comes to free speech online, digital privacy, net neutrality and innovation — we got your back!